Tools To Defend Israel

AGPI - J-FORCE
FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL

AGPI - J-FORCE FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL AGPI - J-FORCE FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL AGPI - J-FORCE FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL
Home
Never Surrender
The End of Innocence
Testimony
myths-facts
Articles
AGPI University
Talking Points
Hostages
Donate
News
Book

AGPI - J-FORCE
FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL

AGPI - J-FORCE FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL AGPI - J-FORCE FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL AGPI - J-FORCE FOR DEFENDERS OF ISRAEL
Home
Never Surrender
The End of Innocence
Testimony
myths-facts
Articles
AGPI University
Talking Points
Hostages
Donate
News
Book
More
  • Home
  • Never Surrender
  • The End of Innocence
  • Testimony
  • myths-facts
  • Articles
  • AGPI University
  • Talking Points
  • Hostages
  • Donate
  • News
  • Book
  • Home
  • Never Surrender
  • The End of Innocence
  • Testimony
  • myths-facts
  • Articles
  • AGPI University
  • Talking Points
  • Hostages
  • Donate
  • News
  • Book

Fighting Antisemitism is Context-Dependent

Our Philosophy at Future of Israel and its Defenders

December 15, 2023:


If antisemitism's 'context-dependent,' our financial support should be, too When they come calling, 


We owe a debt of gratitude to Harvard president Claudine Gay, MIT president Sally Kornbluth and University of Pennsylvania president Elizabeth Magill for introducing a valuable assessment tool that we can now use when considering financial support for universities and other institutions. 


Henceforth, when approached by a university seeking endorsement for a project or chair, my response will be that it's a "context-dependent decision." The university's stance on antisemitism and the actions it has taken will be pivotal factors in determining whether I give it my support.


If university administrators are applying such a lens to addressing antisemitism and calls for genocide against the Jewish people, it's only fair that we employ similar criteria for supporting their institutions. This standardized response will become my policy when asked to support any cause.


This stance comes out of the recent testimony given by these three presidents before a congressional hearing led by Rep. Elise Stefanik. When asked if "calling for the genocide of Jews" would violate their schools' code of conduct, Magill responded, "It is a context-dependent decision, congresswoman."


Magill resigned days later after a donor threatened to withdraw his $100 million gift, but her arrogance remains a pinnacle moment in the fight against campus Antisemitism.


The dismissive and condescending "context-dependent" reply from Gay, Magill and Kornbluth demands a robust response. It's crucial to recognize that we are engaged in an ideological war against a radical left-wing movement that seeks to undermine core Judeo-Christian values.


Allowing calls for genocide against Jewish people makes it particularly challenging for universities to extract further funds from our community. Universities may now face challenges when the Jewish community and its supporters, who are known for their generosity, start withdrawing millions in support.


The tolerance for genocidal chants like "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and calls for "intefadeh" have reached their limit. While my support for higher learning now hinges on a university's willingness to confront antisemitism, I will extend this approach to hospitals, community centres and everything in between.


According to Gay, Magill and Kornbluth, "context" alone is insufficient; action must turn into conduct in order to be dealt with. If a university denounces antisemitism but fails to take action, it will not receive my support.


The "context versus conduct" framework is applicable in our fight against all behaviours that harm the fight against antisemitism and can extend to the hypocrisy of political leaders. For example, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau lighting a menorah in honour of Hanukkah one evening with the Jewish community (context) contrasts sharply with directing officials at the United Nations to vote against Israel the next day (conduct).


The "context-dependent decision" is a form of doublespeak that has permeated progressive left-wing circles since the Oct. 7 massacre, revealing an unprecedented level of denial and distortion not seen since the Holocaust. The fact that it took UN Women eight weeks to denounce Hamas rapes and sexual assaults of Israeli women illustrates the problem.


In this context-dependent era, those who are supposed to exemplify morality are asking the public to tolerate their intolerant. They use concepts like "freedom of expression" to deny and distort the truth and refuse to take action against those advocating for violence, death and destruction if it conflicts with their narrative.


It's time to turn the tables on them. It's time to reject the hypocrites who have eroded moral decency. When they come calling, tell them you will make a context- and conduct-based decision.


National Post

Avi Abraham Benlolo is the Founder and CEO of the Abraham Global Peace Initiative.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/if-antisemitisms-context-dependent-our-financial-support-should-be-too

A Future Peace Ally or a Trojan Horse

December 8, 2023


TEL AVIV — To be sure, very few Israelis want to discuss peace with the Palestinians. They also definitely do not want to discuss a two-state solution. 


A poll from Tel Aviv University's Peace Index conducted after the Oct. 7 attack found that the vast majority (66 per cent) of Israeli Jews are against negotiation with the Palestinian Authority. It's easy to see why: the PA's antisemitic president, Mahmoud Abbas, is the last person on the planet to be trusted.


Yet the West continues to fund him and his corrupt regime. Because he wears a suit and tie, we pretend he is the more moderate of the killers in the Palestinian territories. Fearing the radicalism of his own people, he hasn’t even mustered the courage to denounce the Hamas murders and rapes.

It’s difficult to want to talk to anyone on the Palestinian side these days. I've been in Israel for the past couple weeks and every single Israeli I've met is traumatized. Every conversation is about the pogrom. They cannot eat. They cannot sleep. They weep. The sexual assaults have left women afraid to get into taxis or walk alone at night.


The country is in mourning for the 1,200 who were killed on Oct. 7 and the at least 411 soldiers who have given their lives defending the country since then. Every conversation on the street, in the market and in cafes is about the so-called Black Sabbath. The pain and suffering is surreal, even causing some people to lose faith, while others pray harder.


While an estimated 137 Israelis are still being held hostage by Hamas, no one will even consider the day after tomorrow, especially while the world continues to deny the atrocities. Many justifiably feel that any Palestinian leader who is advocating peace and reconciliation now has a long-term motive in mind — and it isn’t good for Israel.


But what if — just what if — there was someone on the inside who could hold Palestinians accountable? That’s why, despite hesitation and concern about being taken for a ride, I agreed to meet with Mansour Abbas in Tel Aviv earlier this week. Abbas (not related to the PA president) is a member of Israel’s parliament and the leader of the United Arab List.


He gained national notoriety and maybe some respect when he joined the Bennett-Lapid coalition a couple of years ago. It was a marriage of convenience since Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid needed his seats to form a government. Yet for the first time in Israel’s history, an Arab party had both agreed to, and was welcomed into, the government.


I did not go easy on Abbas, however. This climate has made everyone skeptical, as the crime is unforgivable. So I was rather blunt with Abbas about his motive, even questioning him on his party's roots in the Muslim Brotherhood.


He promises his party recognizes Israel, abides by the law and seeks a two-state solution, with Palestinians living side-by-side with Israel in peace. And he said that his affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood is non-violent and in complete compliance with Israeli law.


Even while he is accused of flip-flopping, as most politicians are, his actions to date have been consistent with what he is saying. But we can never know for sure. Many Israelis viewed Abbas’ inclusion in the government with trepidation. Others saw it as a leap forward for Israeli democracy, inclusion and pluralism.


Crime in Arab communities was becoming a problem and Abbas, who is an Israeli citizen, said he worked to improve the lives of Arab-Israelis, securing a wealth of funding for Arab communities from the previous government.


He is regularly criticized by Palestinians and Israelis — the former calling him a traitor and the latter calling him an Islamist operator. This week, he was criticized again by both sides for saying on CNN that Palestinian factions should lay down their arms.


Maybe it’s my propensity to be hopeful and to look for solutions when perhaps there are none, but Abbas appears to be different on the surface. He comes from a mixed Druze, Christian and Muslim village. He was educated at Hebrew University, becoming a dentist. He has spoken out about the Holocaust and antisemitism, and has denounced the heinous crimes committed by Hamas.


We spoke openly about the need for reform in the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian education system, which continues to incite violence against Israel and Jews. While he still believes in a two-state solution, he also thinks that reforming Palestinian society is a 10-year process.


The heinous crimes committed by Hamas, Abbas said, were against the tenets of Islam. A devout Muslim, he explained that there are verses in the Qur'an that demand peace with the Jewish people. Sadly, he said, Hamas choose verses that promote violence.


My litmus test for Abbas was in what he thought about the pro-Palestinian calls on our university campuses and on our streets for the annihilation of the Jewish people. I expressed to him that his voice could be helpful in denouncing slogans like, “From the river to the sea.”


Abbas readily agreed to record himself on my video camera denouncing such slander and defamation — but unfortunately he still walks a fine line and said this applies to both sides. The truth is that calls for death and destruction of the other are only coming from the Palestinian side.


Abbas is either courageous or deceptive, I don’t know for sure yet. He is walking a fine line navigating both communities, yet working to advance his own agenda. Maybe, I quietly suggested to him, he is the leader needed to reform the Palestinian Authority and end the violence and incitement. Almost anyone would be better than Mahmoud Abbas.


He didn’t disagree. If Oct. 7 taught us anything, it’s that Israelis have been too trusting. Palestinians living in Gaza who were helped by local Israelis came back and slaughtered their helpers. We must be cautious of Trojan horses, yet never forget our own Jewish tradition and strive to make the world a better place.


National Post

Avi Benlolo is founder and CEO of the Abraham Global Peace Initiative.


https://nationalpost.com/opinion/can-mansour-abbas-bridge-the-canyon-between-israelis-and-palestinians

Like Hamas, UNRWA Must Be Removed

AGPI Calls for Dismantling of UNRWA

December 1, 2023 in the National Post


The lies, denials and innuendos about Israel distributed by United Nations and its affiliated agencies have long been outrageous. But this week, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) reached a new low that illustrates its veracious appetite to take advantage of the war by spreading lies to raise money.


Yesterday, I received an email from Marta Malaspina, a member of UNRWA’s so-called Digital Fundraising Team. I could not believe that she wrote that the “ongoing war in Gaza comes after 75 years of continuous displacement and dispossession.” Nice wordsmithing, if only it were honest.

In reaction, I sent her the following note: “Hi Marta, I am baffled how someone seemingly educated like you can spread lies to raise a few dollars. I just received your email saying that 'the ongoing war in Gaza comes after 75 years of continuous displacement and dispossession.' No, Ms. Malaspina, it comes after the Hamas attack of October 7th in which Palestinians murdered 1,200 Jews in cold blood. Why can’t you be honest?"


Obviously, I continued, “We will expose these lies and encourage our own government in Canada to stop funding UNRWA because it’s not truthful. Your note again proves it in writing. So, your fundraising email, because it shows the true colours of UNRWA, will bring about the defunding of UNRWA.”

This is already happening. This week, after spending nearly $1 billion on UNRWA over the last five years, Germany announced it is freezing all funding.


“UNRWA is not making a contribution to a peaceful solution,” Max Lucks of Germany's Greens said. “Not a single cent from Germany should reach teachers who glorify the terror of Hamas.”

Similarly, the European Union has moved to withhold 39 million euros (C$58 million) from Palestinian groups, including from UNRWA.  These NGOs are often accused of inciting hatred against Israel. The EU and other funders have demanded UNRWA and other agencies enforce contracts that require their schools and programs to be monitored. However, none of this has proven effective.


“The problem is that Israel actually needs UNRWA,” one highly-placed official in the organization told me in confidence WHEN WAS THIS?. UNRWA seems to believe serving Israel and the Palestinians themselves. They have our government convinced to the tune of $100 million in funding plus some additional emergency money.


I told the official that several years ago that my organization, the Abraham Global Peace Initiative, did try to reach out to UNRWA in the hope of finding a way to work together. But since that time, I expressed, “I can see now that UNRWA unfortunately, is holding the Palestinians themselves hostage.”


I explained to the UNRWA official that the organization itself, and its staff, unfortunately is spreading lies, and that this week’s fundraising letter is yet another example. UNRWA “is the only refugee organization in the world for one specific group (the Palestinians). Unlike other societies that promote co-existence and assimilation of refugees, UNRWA has not promoted integration into the societies in which Palestinians have moved." For some examples, see Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.


That means, I explained to the official, that UNRWA is the problem to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Therefore, there needs to be a completely new system that is organized to aid the Palestinians and provide humanitarian relief, but with an objective of developing a sustainable society.


A new internationally funded entity needs to push for growing cooperation instead of isolation and absorption of refugees into their current places of residence. Holding Palestinians prisoners in this false narrative that one day they might “return” is counterproductive. It builds anger and frustration and limits the vision for a bright future.


Additionally, UNRWA schools have been teaching anti-Israel and antisemitic materials while turning a blind eye when their schools become rocket bunkers for Hamas. The result is a vicious society that committed heinous crimes against innocent Israelis on Oct. 7. We need to hold UNRWA and its funders accountable for the crimes committed against the innocent Jews and foreigners who were murdered and kidnapped on that day.


Malaspina and her fundraising team at UNRWA had the audacity of disregarding the barbarism that took place on that black day. She called for “solidarity” with the Palestinians but not with the Jewish women who were raped and the Jewish children who were mutilated by the very people her agency supports.


This level of denial and distortion needs to be called out. Given these blatant facts, UNRWA must be removed from Gaza alongside Hamas. A new non-permanent humanitarian relief program must be created to build a new society that can co-exist peacefully with Israel. Anything else will be detrimental to both Palestinians and Israelis living in the region.


Avi Abraham Benlolo is the Founder and CEO of the Abraham Global Peace Initiative.
National Post

Western Feminists' Despicable Silence

November 24, 2023


In the realm of democracies, it appears that the cherished Judeo-Christian principles, foundational to many societies, have taken a backseat. The moral compass seems skewed, flipped by a self-destructive generation quick to label anyone they disagree with as racists or colonialists.


As we approach the UN-designated International Day for the Prevention of Violence against Women, it's disheartening to note the silence from women's groups on the horrifying rapes and assaults suffered by Jewish women at the hands of Hamas on Oct. 7. As a father of two girls, witnessing feminist groups treating these atrocities differently is deeply troubling.


Israel's First Lady, Michal Herzog, addressed this silence in a recent Newsweek article, condemning women's groups for not denouncing the heinous acts witnessed at the Nova music festival. Reports detailed Hamas terrorists engaging in gang rapes, murder, and mutilation of women. Shockingly, a video even captured terrorists torturing a pregnant woman and removing her fetus.


Despite ample video and physical evidence of these crimes, there is a deafening lack of condemnation. Herzog revealed that forensic scientists found evidence of women and girls subjected to violence so brutal that their pelvic bones were broken. Disturbing videos, such as those of young Israeli girls mistreated in Gaza, further highlight the gravity of the situation.


One perplexing aspect is the contradiction with Islamic teachings, which strictly prohibit rape and consider it haram (forbidden), imposing severe punishment on the perpetrator. Modesty, especially for women, is deemed sacred in Islam. The question arises: Why haven't Muslim groups condemned Hamas for these crimes? Is it because the victims were Jewish?


Notably, organizations like UN Women and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women have yet to denounce these rapes. Sadly, lessons from history remind us that denial and distortion are common tactics of antisemites. While not all feminists and leftists share these views, all antisemites invariably deny the truth.


Relying on organizations advocating for human rights to uphold truth and justice is increasingly challenging. Recent weeks have seen an alarming effort to suppress and deny the crimes committed by Hamas, as if they never occurred. That’s why I am now in Israel to collect as much evidence as possible — to safeguard the truth for the onslaught of denial that will undoubtedly hit us at the next fabricated “Israeli apartheid week” at your local campus.


It is disturbing the University of Alberta sexual assault center signed on to a letter that questioned whether these assaults happened, and underscores the gravity of the situation. Fortunately, the university swiftly dismissed the director, reaffirming its commitment to morals and ethics. The kind note from the Acting-Dean was appreciated, demonstrating there is still hope for our campuses.


The undeniable atrocities and war crimes of Oct. 7 stand as a stark reality. Yet, for some, being born Jewish and an Israeli citizen seems to exempt you from the application of international law. Antisemitism trumps justice, even in the face of rape and murder. Shame befalls any human rights organization that fails to acknowledge these crimes.


As we approach the International Day for the Prevention of Violence against Women, there's a final opportunity for these organizations to break their silence and stand against injustice. The time to act is now.


Avi Benlolo is the Founder and CEO of The Abraham Global Peace Initiative. You can learn more about it at www.agpiworld.com

Where is Trudeau's moral clarity on Israel?

Where is Trudeau's moral clarity on Israel's war against Hamas?

Saturday November 17, 2023


The images of premature babies outside incubators in a Hamas-controlled hospital and the tragic deaths of women and children in Gaza evoke deep emotions, emphasizing the equal preciousness of all life. Israel makes every effort to preserve life, while Hamas uses its population as human shields, sacrificing them for gullible western sympathy.


By now we know that these hospitals housed and covered up Hamas' terrorism against Israel. One wonders if many of the doctors and staff at these hospitals were not Hamas operatives themselves.

But Prime Minister Trudeau, known for his empathetic communication, went overboard against Israel again by declaring "The world is witnessing this killing of women, of children, of babies. This has to stop." It made Canadians wonder just whose side Trudeau is on — Canada's democratic ally or the jihadists?


His statement was so over the top hurtful it sent a shudder down the Jewish community in Canada and it provoked an immediate reply from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said: "It is not Israel that is deliberately targeting civilians but Hamas that beheaded, burned and massacred civilians in the worst horrors perpetrated on Jews since the Holocaust ... The forces of civilization must back Israel in defeating Hamas barbarism."


Ever since our prime minister wrongfully implied Israel was to blame for an errant Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket that hit Al-Ahli hospital, that sent thousands of Antisemitic rioters to our city streets (in reality, the rocket didn't even hit the hospital, only the parking lot).


Canadians are puzzled about Mr. Trudeau's moral clarity, and ability to differentiate between terrorists and a democratic state defending itself.


After the horrifying brutality of the Hamas Oct. 7 massacre in which 1,200 Israelis were murdered (the vast majority civilians) and 239 hostages taken, the U.S., the U.K., Germany, France, and Italy, issued a joint statement condemning the attack with moral clarity and a clear strategy.


Mr. Trudeau initially appeared to be in agreement, acknowledging Israel's right and obligation to defend itself against Hamas. Western nations emphasized that Hamas, as a terrorist organization, did not represent the aspirations of the Palestinian people.


However, concerns arise as Mr. Trudeau seems to have shifted away from both moral clarity and a viable strategy in this war against terrorism. His concern about human life lacks proper assignment of responsibility for civilian deaths in Gaza. International law is not a suicide pact; rights come with responsibilities, and intent in war is seminal.


Senior Hamas member Ghazi Hamad's statement, that Oct. 7 should be repeated, underscores the proud commitment to atrocities and the intention to repeat them until Israel is eliminated. In such a scenario, what actions would Canada take when faced with an existential threat?


Mr. Trudeau's declaration that Israel's defence is unacceptable due to civilian casualties implies a demand for Israel to fight with both hands tied behind its back. Imposing such conditions on a defending ally seems impractical and potentially detrimental to their survival.


But Israel's survival may not be atop of Trudeau's list, it seems. Recently, Canada announced an increase in funding to the infamous United Nations Relief Works Agency (UNRWA). It's the same organization that has said more about Israel in this war than about Hamas hiding its munitions in its schools.


Despite our incessant warnings that money is fungible and therefore the organization is indirectly subsidizing antisemitic curriculum in its schools and worse, helping incentivize terrorism (through payments to martyrs), our prime minister turned a blind eye. We even published a comprehensive report on funding of Palestinian terrorism on the matter that was signed by Judea Pearl, whose son Daniel was beheaded by Pakistani Jihadis and by Stuart Force, whose son Taylor was murdered by Palestinian Jihadis.


Leading up to the Hamas massacre, the murder of dozens of Israelis was partly and indirectly funded by UNRWA, which receives funding from Canada. When one Canadian diplomat called our reaction to Canada's $100 million allocation "harsh" we wondered just how out of touch with its own complicity in driving Palestinian terrorism our government is. Does this response still seem harsh in the face of such brutal massacres of Jews? Or is it still okay because local politics trumps morality?


The money we and other western democracies give the Palestinians went to building the tunnel system in Gaza, rather than to improving Palestinian lives. The Hamas rockets fired at Israeli citizens are made possible by our aid money. And the massacre itself, quantified by the sadistic hatred of the jihadists, can be linked to the school textbooks that teach hate in UNRWA schools.


How is it possible that Hamas leaders who are basking in the sun in Qatar are worth $5 billion? Most were once labourers on construction sites. Its because they have taxed our aid money and siphoned it into their personal bank accounts, instead of helping and uplifting Gazans. They want them to live in squalor and misery.


Mr. Trudeau's inversion of truth is not dissimilar to the leftists moral bankruptcy of blaming the Hamas massacre of Jews on Israel. Even UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres had the audacity of alluding that the killing of Jews was brought on by themselves. Its the post-colonialist, woke, perversion of reality. Its like saying the horrific murder and treatment of our indigenous population by colonizers was their own fault.


In truth, the blame of the death of civilians on both sides is on Canada and other western nations. Our tax dollars continue to perpetuate Palestinian animosity against Israel by keeping them in a refugee holding pattern, unlike any other refugee group on earth.


Trudeau owes Israel and the Jewish community an apology for putting the blame on them, rather than on where it truly belongs — on Hamas. Hamas is centrally responsible for the deaths of civilians on both sides, but Canada and the West need to recognize that by funding UNWRA we a unwittingly or irresponsibly have contributed to this disaster.


Avi Benlolo is the Founder and Chairman of The Abraham Global Peace Initiative. Aurel Braun is a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Toronto and an associate at Harvard University’s Davis Center.


https://nationalpost.com/opinion/opinion-hamas-massacres-funded-by-western-aid-money

Hamas Must Face Justice

The International Criminal Court must prosecute Hamas's war crimes

Two haunting dates that have been forever etched into Jewish history converged this week. On Nov. 7, Israelis observed a day of mourning marking the one-month anniversary of the massacre of 1,400 people by Hamas terrorists. A sombre silence fell at precisely 11:00 a.m.


Two days later, on Nov. 9, Jewish communities commemorated the 85th anniversary of Kristallnacht, also known as the Night of Broken Glass. During that ominous night, Nazis, particularly the Hitler Youth, attacked Jewish communities in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia.


It’s worth noting that many of today’s pro-Palestinian antisemitic protesters in western cities are also organized by “Palestinian youth” movements.


Kristallnacht witnessed the horrifying incarceration of 30,000 Jewish men in concentration camps, the destruction of over 260 synagogues, the burning of 7,500 Jewish businesses and the brutal beating and cold-blooded murder of scores of Jews.


That night opened a dark gateway, granting Germans permission to transition from mere words to violent actions. With Hitler’s rise to power, Jewish life was severely constrained by a series of antisemitic laws that foreshadowed the violence on Nov. 9, 1938, and eventually led to the Holocaust.

The Holocaust unfolded because a pervasive antisemitic sentiment gripped the world. No international military or legal intervention thwarted Germany’s march towards the genocide of the Jews. It wasn’t until the end of the Second World War in 1945 that the world decided to prosecute the orchestrators of the Holocaust in Nuremberg, Germany.


Today, the world faces another test. Hamas’s genocidal intentions against Israel are glaringly evident. A Hamas leader in Lebanon openly declared on television the group’s desire to destroy the Jewish state and annihilate its people.


To prevent a repetition of history, the global community must promptly activate international legal systems to arrest Hamas’s leadership and halt their quest for genocide. This week, my foundation, the Abraham Global Peace Initiative, sent a letter to International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan, urging him to issue arrest warrants for key Hamas leaders.


Citing the Geneva Convention and the internationally accepted laws of armed conflict, our letter outlines key Hamas violations of international law.


Among them, three egregious transgressions demand immediate action from the ICC: the taking of hostages (Hamas captured an estimated 242 Israeli and foreign nationals); torture and rape (video footage exists of Hamas torturing and raping Israeli civilians on Oct. 7); and directly targeting civilians (evidence from training manuals discovered after the massacre indicates that Hamas intentionally targeted civilians).


Hamas has continued to target Israeli civilians through indiscriminate rockets fired at populated centres. Moreover, Hamas uses its own civilian population as “human shields,” which is strictly prohibited by international law. The organization conducts military operations in civilian areas, pilfers food, fuel and medicine from civilian stockpiles and aid agencies, and launches attacks against Israel and Israeli forces from playgrounds and hospitals.


Hamas shows little care or concern for the lives of civilians on either side, which constitutes war crimes. In stark contrast, Israel diligently strives to protect civilian lives. Since Oct. 7, the Israel Defence Forces has made over 20,000 phone calls, dropped 1.5-million leaflets and sent over four-million SMS messages warning civilians about upcoming military actions and urging them to temporarily move to safety zones.


Regrettably, the International Criminal Court has become a political tool of the Palestinians and their allies. Nevertheless, Hamas unequivocally violated every international military protocol and convention. If the court is to have any legitimacy at all, it will issue arrest warrants. If it were to disregard the well-documented truth about what Hamas did on Oct. 7 and in the month since, or if it were to adopt a neutral stance, the ICC would be failing humanity.


From Kristallnacht, we gleaned the ominous lesson that those who burn books will ultimately burn people. Modern events echo the Holocaust, when the world’s failure to act resulted in tragedy. Israel, learning from this history, is acting decisively by eliminating Hamas, mirroring what should have been done with the Nazis. An indictment of Hamas leaders by the ICC would underscore that Israel stands on the right side of justice.


National Post

Avi Benlolo is the founder and chairman of the Abraham Global Peace Initiative.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/the-international-criminal-court-must-prosecute-hamass-war-crimes

The extreme rise in antisemitism is hardening the Jewish com

The extreme rise in antisemitism is hardening the Jewish community


We have always stood up for others. Who stands up for us now?

Author of the article:Avi BenloloPublished Nov 03, 2023  •  Last updated 8 hours ago  •  3 


A number of years ago, I participated in a press conference alongside a group of Holocaust survivors to denounce the heinous and barbaric gassing of entire villages by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Following the so-called Arab Spring and his own citizens’ calls for freedom, al-Assad had murdered between 350,000 and 500,000 men, women and children, which constituted a genocide.


Surprisingly, there were no demonstrations on the streets of the Middle East. There were no rampaging mobs converging on London Bridge or burning tires in the suburbs of Paris. In Toronto and major cities across America, there were no demonstrations by pro-Palestinian groups calling out what was undoubtedly a real genocide. All was quiet.


When Egypt cracked down on dissidents, when mobs of people rampaged through Libya and Tunisia calling for their freedom but were murdered by their own governments by the dozen, our university campuses remained silent. Unions hardly raised a fuss, if any. There were no hate-crime incidents, and students in schools did not dress up like Hamas terrorists for Halloween. It was as if the world had turned a blind eye.


Nonetheless, we spoke out in the dead of winter on a bitterly cold day, surrounded by every media outlet available to our city. These Holocaust survivors, having walked in the shadow of death, now in their 80s and 90s (most have now passed away), found the courage and righteousness to speak out for Syrians — a Muslim nation that has been at war with Israel for 75 years.


We have always stood up for others. Even now, you see some Jewish groups speaking out for Palestinians in Gaza, albeit mostly misinformed. But now, with surging antisemitism here at home and around the world, we boldly wonder, where were the school walkouts for the 1,400 Jews who were brutally massacred on Oct. 7?


Where are the pro-Palestinian demonstrations demanding that Hamas return the 242 Israelis and foreigners held in medieval-like conditions in Gaza? Where are the candlelight vigils and the calls to stop bombing Israeli cities and towns with crude rockets aimed at civilian populations? Where are the so-called international human rights organizations that eagerly promote the Hamas narrative but remain silent over the 500,000 displaced Israeli civilians?


The world hasn’t been silent; but not in a good way. Instead, it has given voice to extraordinary antisemitism. This week, a woman was filmed in Toronto tearing down posters of children who had been kidnapped by Hamas. This unfathomable, antisemitic loss of a moral compass is a stark reminder of the boycotts the Nazis practised before the Holocaust.


Speaking to a U.S. Senate panel this week, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned that antisemitism is reaching “historic levels” in America. While Jews make up only about 2.4 per cent of the U.S. population, they account for 60 per cent of all religious-based hate crimes, he said. Nearly every major city is reporting sharp increases, in some cases doubling or more, as has been the case in Toronto.

Threats made against Jewish students have caused Cornell University to cancel classes today. At Harvard, a group of students was filmed harassing a Jewish student. Here in Canada, students at Toronto Metropolitan University’s law school and York University have published declarations that promote violence, leaving Jewish students wondering if they are safe.


Director Wray’s warning that “the Jewish community is targeted by terrorists (really) across the spectrum” emphasizes the looming threat to America and Canada. The growing radicalism on our campuses and in our streets is inspired by Hamas and may lead to homegrown violent extremists and foreign terrorist organizations jeopardizing the safety and security of our nations, not just the Jewish community.


The extreme rise in antisemitism is hardening the Jewish community. We see those on our campuses and streets who sympathize with Hamas and emulate its virulent hatred as being not much different from the Nazis. Our only recourse is to strengthen our resolve and determination and stand firm with Israel. Holocaust survivors are now almost gone, but we are here to carry forward their fight in the name of Never Again.


https://nationalpost.com/opinion/avi-benlolo-the-extreme-rise-in-antisemitism-is-hardening-the-jewish-community

The UN Blames the Victims

António Guterres blames the victims of Hamas's massacre

The UN secretary general's statement was equivalent to telling Ukrainians that they invited the Russian slaughter


Author of the article:Avi BenloloPublished Oct 27, 2023


In 1996, Daniel Goldhagen published a seminal book that changed the Holocaust narrative. In “Hitler’s Willing Executioners,” Goldhagen showed that the vast majority of the German public supported Hitler’s determined effort to commit genocide against the Jewish people because they were motivated by a unique and virulent form of “eliminationist antisemitism” that had been ingrained in German identity for centuries.


Antisemitism, in other words, empowered ordinary people to believe that Jews deserved to be eliminated from the face of the earth.


The view that 1,400 Israelis deserved to be murdered by Hamas is not dissimilar. Having been indoctrinated with large doses of antisemitism since childhood, Hamas terrorists brutally murdered Jewish men and women, babies and children, the infirm and the elderly. Their barbarism mirrored the heinous genocidal crimes committed by the Nazis.


Despite these crimes, the Jewish people have been re-victimized by those who have attempted to justify this mass murder. In ancient times, pogroms and crusades against Jews blamed the Jews themselves. After all, we were supposedly responsible for things like deicide, the black plague and a global conspiracy to control the world. We deserved all the pain and suffering that befell us. That’s antisemitism.


In light of this history, it was disturbing to hear United Nations Secretary General António Guterres tell the world in front of the Security Council this week that Jews were essentially responsible for Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre. “It is important to also recognize the attacks by Hamas did not happen in a vacuum,” he declared.


Caught red-handed, the following day, Guterres refused to apologize, instead saying, “I am shocked by misrepresentations by some of my statement yesterday in the Security Council — as if I was justifying acts of terror by Hamas.” Yet that is exactly what he appeared to be doing, given that, in the same breath, he said that, “The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of suffocating occupation.”


This is equivalent to telling the Rwandan Tutsis that they were responsible for their own murders. It’s like telling the girls that Boko Haram kidnapped and raped that it was their fault. It’s akin to telling Ukrainians that they invited the Russian slaughter.


Guterres is not antisemitic. He has denounced antisemitism vigorously in the past. Yet somehow, perhaps because of the prevailing bias against Israel at the UN, he adopted the rhetoric espoused by Hamas apologists, blaming Israel for the massacre inflicted on its citizens.


His comments seemed out of character to me, given his past support for the Jewish people, but it demonstrates how easy it is to succumb to the concerted PR campaign Hamas supporters launched even before the bodies of the dead Israelis had grown cold.


Guterres would have appeared like a statesman had he used the opportunity to scold the Palestinians for not accepting the UN’s 1947 partition plan and for consistently scuttling opportunities for peace. He could have held the Palestinians accountable for creating and supporting Hamas. He could have castigated them for decades of incessant terrorist attacks against Israelis and relentless incitement against Jews.


Guterres could have used the moment to critique the UN for maintaining the status quo by ensuring Palestinians remain as perpetual refugees. He could have criticized the antisemitic indoctrination of Palestinian students in UN-run schools.


After being blamed by the United Nations for the murder of innocents, Israel has rightly stopped issuing visas to UN officials and called for Guterres’s resignation. Like the instantaneous false blame Israel received over the bombing of the hospital in Gaza, it’s too late to walk this back. This kind of sentiment seeps into the public consciousness immediately and invites antisemitism and more incitement against Israel.


Words are weapons and they are used today, as they were used by the Nazis and those who came before them, to invite hate against the Jewish people. This must stop.


National Post

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/antonio-guterres-blames-the-victims-of-hamass-massacre

Failure to Condemn Hamas Atrocities Highlights Antisemitism

Create Your Masterpiece with Future of Israel and its Defenders

Rashida Tlaib's failure to condemn Hamas atrocities highlights insidiousness of antisemitism


The decades-long push to delegitimize Israel has led to a reprehensible willingness to excuse the largest mass slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust

Author of the article:Avi BenloloPublished Oct 13, 2023  


In a recent encounter at the Capitol building in Washington, D.C., a Fox News reporter approached U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, pressing her to condemn the tragic events involving the loss of innocent lives in Israel at the hands of Hamas. Tlaib chose not to respond and continued walking.


In two moving speeches at the White House this week, President Joe Biden passionately condemned silence and complicity. Not since the Holocaust, he said, had so many Jews been murdered. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that, “There is only one place for Germany — the place at Israel’s side.”


But the past week has been marked by an overwhelming sense of moral dilemma, stemming from the heart-wrenching loss of over 1,300 lives along the Gaza border. Some victims were still asleep in the early hours of Saturday when Hamas terrorists invaded their homes, committing unspeakable acts of violence.


Reports of around infants being decapitated and burned alive in Kfar Aza — a village that fell victim to acts of brutality that can only be likened to a bygone era of feudal barbarism — defy adequate description. Even seasoned reporters, who were present to document these horrors, were profoundly shaken by what they witnessed.


Elsewhere along the Gaza border, thousands of young adults gathered at a music festival to celebrate “friends, love and peace.” But their joy was short-lived. Palestinian terrorists indiscriminately opened fire on them, surpassing even the ruthlessness of groups like ISIL.


Over 260 young people, most in their 20s, were murdered in cold blood. Many were shot as they desperately tried to flee. They were unarmed and bewildered, yet the Hamas terrorists showed no mercy, killing innocent civilians and raping young women next to the dead bodies of their friends.


In addition to these massacres, there were numerous kidnappings. Hamas terrorists abducted an estimated 100-150 individuals, including children, women, teenagers and even a Holocaust survivor. Those they killed suffered a gruesome fate, their bodies dragged naked through the streets of Gaza, desecrated and humiliated. For those held captive, it’s feared that torture and ransom may await them.


Representative Tlaib’s refusal to condemn these horrors raises questions about the moral underpinnings of the international Palestinian solidarity movement. The chant, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” takes on a haunting dimension considering these events. There’s little doubt about what would happen to the State of Israel and its citizens if they were to lay down their weapons even for a day.


Tlaib is part of a generation of advocates who have long called for Israel’s eradication, a sentiment that can be traced back to the Durban Conference on racism and xenophobia in South Africa in 2001. This event laid the foundation for the delegitimization and defamation of Israel, including the unfounded claim that it is an “apartheid state,” mirroring tactics legitimately used against apartheid South Africa.


Radical leftists, unionists and academics joined the Palestinian cause in South Africa, often masking their deep-seated antisemitism. Upon their return home, they launched and supported campaigns such as “Israeli apartheid week” and the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against the Jewish state.


For nearly two decades, university students have been exposed to falsehoods about Israel and, by extension, the Jewish people. These beliefs became normalized in global organizations like the United Nations Human Rights Council, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, all of which echoed and reinforced these baseless allegations.


In Toronto, the annual Al-Quds Day event has long been permitted to take place at the footsteps of the provincial legislature. Originating in Iran, the event draws leftist and Islamist groups, forming an unlikely coalition united by their hostility toward Jews and their call for Israel’s destruction. Last weekend’s events are exactly what they were calling for.


Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, has persistently fought against these campaigns to delegitimize it. The country has proudly championed human rights, advanced LGBTQ and women’s rights, celebrated coexistence and played a leading role in promoting these values in the region.


Despite these efforts, the Palestinian campaign of defamation, coupled with deeply rooted antisemitism, has continued to legitimize and embolden hatred against Israel, specifically among progressive leftists and far-right white supremacists.


Recently, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said that Adolf Hitler “fought the Jews because they were dealing with usury and money.” For centuries, these words have been spoken by rabid antisemites to mobilize violence against Jewish communities.


While governments, like Canada’s, have condemned antisemitism, they have simultaneously continued to fund the Palestinian narrative by channelling money to organizations like UNRWA. This funding has sustained schools in Gaza and the West Bank that promote violence and hatred against Jews.


Let me be clear: any country that condemns Hamas but is still sending money to the Palestinians — including Canada’s Liberal government, which pledged this week to continue funnelling around $55 million annually in development assistance and aid to Gaza and the West Bank, thus allowing their governments to divert resources to terrorism —  is complicit in the crimes that are being committed against Jews in Israel.


The shocking loss of Israeli lives represents the culmination of years of emboldening Hamas and other terrorist organizations by delegitimizing Israel and allowing antisemitism to flourish. Even in the face of war crimes and heinous acts, the Palestinian movement refuses to unequivocally denounce such actions. Some media outlets, including the CBC, which are heavily influenced by the Palestinian narrative of “resistance,” have adopted policies that inaccurately label terrorists as militants.


Social media is rife not just with antisemitic Palestinians, but with people who hold influential positions, including doctors, union leaders and academics, posting messages denying the barbarism that took place. If they cannot deny it, they blame Israel and the Jews for inviting the murders, decapitations and rapes. This should be condemned vigorously by all.


Reflecting on our historical experiences, particularly the Holocaust, we understand the dangers of complicity. The brutal murder of six-million Jews and millions of others occurred because hundreds of thousands of people played a role, be it as journalists, train operators, contractors, doctors, lawyers, mothers or fathers. They perpetuated the propaganda and antisemitism they were exposed to, which ultimately led to the genocide. The same is applicable today.


For those of you who identify as pro-Palestinian and remain silent in the face of Hamas’ heinous acts, it’s crucial to examine your moral compass. Such silence has far-reaching consequences — not only for the present, but for the future of humanity.


National Post

Avi Benlolo is the founder and chairman of the Abraham Global Peace Initiative.

  • The End of Innocence
  • Articles
  • AGPI University
  • Talking Points
  • Donate
  • News
  • Book

J-FORCE

Copyright © 2024 Future of Israel and its Defenders - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by The Abraham Global Peace Initiative

DONATE TO SUPPORT FIGHT FOR ISRAEL

HELP DEFEND ISRAEL

Learn more